Caught in the Middle

  • Opinion
  • February 29, 2024
  • 0 Comments

By Tommy Kruecker-Green and Isabella Yan
STAFF WRITERS

As sophomores, our view of the future oscillates between daydreams and despair. One moment we envision delivering valedictorian speeches and accepting awards in our dream career. In the next, we sink into the uncertainty of plotting life trajectories without a map or compass. Who will I become? Can I afford college? What if I never figure out what career inspires me?

Interviews with tenth graders led to a general consensus: our school could do more in sophomore year to help students prepare for their futures. Counselors and teachers often devote the most attention to freshmen adjusting to high school and upperclassmen applying to college. Sophomores inhabit an awkward middle ground—no longer wide-eyed but not ready to prepare ourselves for graduation’s looming deadline. 

From the school’s perspective, limited career advising for sophomores prevents overburdening students and counselors alike. With over a hundred students apiece, counselors prioritize helping those most in need of support. “[Sophomores] are not as needy as a group,” explained counselor Jayne Jones. “You are not applying to college right now, you are not creating a college list, you are not needing a recommendation per se… Sophomores are just sort of left a little bit because they can be left.”

This is a fair point. However, what we choose to participate in during sophomore year holds much greater weight given today’s ultra-competitive admissions landscape. With more students applying for limited spots at top institutions, colleges increasingly seek evidence of commitment and leadership from prospective applicants’ earliest high school years. Admission officers don’t expect us to have life figured out at fifteen or sixteen, but they want signs we’re purposefully sampling activities aligned with our emerging strengths and passions. The stakes feel uncomfortably high for sophomores who are simply hoping to discover their interests, and the hard truth is that involving ourselves with the “right” organizations now can make or break our candidacy down the road. As anxious as it makes students to strategize so far ahead, not scoping out extracurricular opportunities with admissions checkboxes in mind means losing a prime chance to build the “hook” that gets us noticed from the overflowing stacks of applications.

It is because of this intense pressure that sophomores feel they need more personalized guidance on extracurriculars and future planning. Sophomore Eva Nguyen summarized the common sentiment: “Counselors can do more to open up the door to students for discussion about their futures.”

A lack of early career planning is felt especially strongly by sophomores Pranav Yadla and Noor Bhatti, who come from immigrant families without experience with the American college system. 

“I have no idea what colleges want; I didn’t even know what the process was, [so] I had to find it out myself,” said Yadla. Like many students with immigrant parents, his parents received a college education outside the U.S. where there is a completely different admission system.

Over the last few decades, college admissions in the United States have changed tremendously, including significantly higher tuition and changes to general application expectations. These are critical factors that sophomores who intend to attend college should begin to consider.

In a maze of unfamiliar requirements, many sophomores whose parents “don’t know anything” turn to outside sources such as advice from college friends, the internet, or even private college counselors. But, astronomical costs put the latter out of reach for most. Somehow, students from families new to America must solve a complex puzzle missing half the pieces.

More robust sophomore advising would benefit every tenth grader. But this could overburden the already strained counseling department. Perhaps the answer lies in empowering students to self-organize the guidance lacking from formal administration sources. Students could lead group discussions on college essay writing, scholarship opportunities, or lessons learned from older siblings now in college. Retired teachers may volunteer to moderate these student gatherings and offer their advice.

For students from immigrant families, group sessions could help decipher unfamiliar aspects of American college prep: differences in application timelines and requirements between the U.S. and other countries, a breakdown of key standardized tests like the SAT, or nuts and bolts overviews detailing how financial aid functions here. These sessions don’t need a lot of funding—they could operate on a shoestring budget or by student volunteers.

Until we start troubleshooting ways to do more with less, sophomores will continue to be caught in the middle, dangling between childhood dreams and adult decisions. Like trapeze artists without a net, we twist anxiously in the space between launch and catch. The time has come for schools to position the mesh—a safety net of supportive guidance.

Related Posts

CollegeBoard Scores 1/5 on AP Testing Administration
  • June 9, 2025

“Once you enter the start code, you may begin.” With these words, hundreds of AP Psychology students at AHS expected to start their AP exam. Instead, they were greeted by a laggy, glitchy BlueBook testing app that refused to cooperate. For the students who were unable to coax the app into functioning, the exam was delayed to May 21—a poor solution for students who spent a whole year preparing for that moment. 

We at ANDOVERVIEW believe that the fragile testing infrastructure of CollegeBoard is absolutely unacceptable. One would assume that a nonprofit organization that claims to be “paving the path for college success” would ensure that its testing platform relies upon servers that are able to handle the increased traffic on testing day. CollegeBoard provided very little consolation to the adrenaline-crashing students. “Most students have had a successful testing experience, with more than 5 million exams being successfully submitted thus far,” the organization defended. The statement was tellingly short—PR representatives at CollegeBoard couldn’t be bothered to devote any longer than a five-minute coffee break to drafting this “apology.” 

Unfortunately, technical glitches are not the only issues that CollegeBoard has encountered this AP season. After a slew of hate comments were slung in author Namwali Serpell’s direction, she discovered that the vitriol was directed towards one particular passage in one of her books. The infamous “Look at Me” passage was recognized by this year’s AP Lang students as an indecipherable jumble of content followed by some seriously difficult multiple-choice questions (MCQs). After learning this, Serpell revealed that CollegeBoard had included the passage in the test without her permission and distorted its meaning in the MCQs that followed. Adding insult to injury, Serpell also clearly stated that she was against standardized testing as a concept. As of late May, CollegeBoard had yet to address these comments.

The negligence of CollegeBoard has created a sorrowful state of affairs for those looking to take advantage of the benefits of AP courses and exams. To no one’s surprise, the corporatization of education has introduced far more harm than benefit to all involved. We can only hope that CollegeBoard will hear and fix some students’ criticisms.

Continue reading
Oval Office Showdown: Trump’s Diplomatic Disaster
  • May 1, 2025

ANYA GOROVITS || STAFF WRITER

“I think we’ve seen enough. This is going to be great television.” 

With these words, President Trump concluded February 28’s disastrous meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy—a meeting that was intended to strengthen alliances but instead heavily damaged them. Taking place in the Oval Office, a room representing utmost diplomacy, decorum, and statesmanship, the meeting was anything but diplomatic.

Zelenskyy arrived in Washington, D.C. on the morning of February 28. He then met with Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and other US government officials. Reporters from all over the world were also present, bombarding the presidents with questions throughout the meeting. The leaders aimed to discuss continued US support for Ukraine, establish plans on ending the war, and agree on a US mineral deal on Ukraine’s resources. However, the meeting was far from productive, with Trump quickly launching a personal attack against Zelenskyy, Ukraine, and former President Biden rather than trying to stop the war. 

“It was appalling seeing supposedly the leader of the free world, the most powerful person in the world, act like a little child,” expressed half-Ukrainian sophomore Armand Omelko. The end of the meeting was so full of interruptions and insults on Trump’s part that it indeed sounded more like children fighting than a discussion among the highest officials of two nations. Not only was Trump constantly interrupting his guest, but he actually yelled at Zelenskyy for trying to speak about his own country’s opinions. 


“You don’t have the cards right now” was the catchphrase Trump repeatedly used to interrupt Zelenskyy. While speaking to a person tasked with one of the most difficult careers, the president of a country at war, Trump called Zelenskyy’s job a game of cards. 

The meeting started off all right, with the presidents calmly answering the press’s questions. Yet things began to escalate when Republican reporter Brian Glenn asked Zelenskyy why he didn’t wear a suit to the meeting. The disrespect of such a question is unbelievable. Not only is there a valid reason for Zelenskyy’s outfit—in the duration of the war, the president has been wearing army attire to show support for his military—but the question seems incredibly hypocritical considering how US government official Elon Musk has, on numerous occasions, worn very informal attire to the Oval Office.

What I don’t understand is why the international press was at the meeting in the first place. The conference was meant to decide the outcome of millions of lives, which doesn’t seem like something that should be showcased to the entire world. 


“I was horrified by what I was watching. I just couldn’t believe this was playing out in front of cameras in the Oval Office,” said AHS history teacher Kathryn Vives. 

It is obvious that Trump simply wanted to humiliate Zelenskyy. As seen in Trump’s quote about making “great television,” he only wanted more attention for himself. “He just wants to be seen on the news, not to actually accomplish anything,” Omelko said.

Yet the most disrespectful comment came from Vance when he asked Zelenskyy, “Have you said thank you once?” He then attacked Zelenskyy for not being grateful for the US’s aid, which is false. According to UNITED 24, the official fundraising platform of the Ukrainian government, Zelenskyy has publicly thanked the US at least 94 times in speeches and social media posts. Yet Vance still demanded that Zelenskyy thank Trump over and over. When Zelenskyy tried to return to the subject of fixing the war, Trump interrupted him with “No. You’ve done a lot of talking,” as if he was shutting down a child’s remarks and not a president’s. 

“They want him to grovel,” said history teacher Lauren Ream, who was also shocked at how Trump and Vance treated Zelenskyy. “We shouldn’t treat any other country like that,” she added. Considering how Ukraine has been a US ally for over 30 years, this treatment is even more disgraceful.

During the meeting, Trump also managed to lie several times, not just to Zelenskyy but to everyone watching. He made multiple false claims about US aid given to Ukraine during the war. Trump first stated that the US had given over $300 billion to Ukraine, when, according to the Kiel Institute, the correct number as of February 2025 is $128 billion, less than half of Trump’s claim. “And he kept referring to it as being stolen,” added Ream. This money was certainly not stolen. The Biden Administration voted and chose to contribute this aid to Ukraine. Additionally, Trump stated that Europe has given $200 billion less in aid than the US has. However, at that point, Europe had given around $258 billion to Ukraine, more than twice as much as what the US had given.

Furthermore, Trump took pleasure in pivoting the conversation to insult previous presidents. He called Biden “a not very smart person,” which doesn’t seem like something one president should say about another, especially during a meeting that didn’t concern Biden. As for Obama, Trump said to Zelenskyy, “Obama gave you sheets. In fact, the statement is: Obama gave sheets, and Trump gave Javelins (missiles). You’ve got to be more thankful because let me tell you, you don’t have the cards.” I think that bit speaks for itself.

Vives connected the meeting to the 1938 Munich Agreement, when the UK and France appeased Germany, letting it take over land in Czechoslovakia, which led to World War II. Trump also hopes to appease Russia by having Ukraine give up its currently occupied land, which could pose a serious danger for the rest of Europe. “This war isn’t just for Ukraine. If Ukraine really falls, who’s to say Russia will just stop there?” said Omelko.

Since this meeting, many nations and people have lost trust in the US. Because of our network of alliances, any war including Russia can pose an extreme danger to the world. Previously, the US and most European nations agreed on this and worked together to prevent the situation from escalating. Yet Trump’s disrespect for Zelenskyy and positive comments about Russian President Vladimir Putin have changed this. “The US isn’t on [Europe’s] side anymore. The US has switched sides,” said Omelko. The meeting has sent a message to our allies that the US can no longer be trusted. “The greater damage has been done to our reputation across the world—that we are not an ally to be depended on,” agreed Vives.

Continue reading

Leave a Reply

You Might Also Like

Spanish Department to Host Day of the Dead Fair

  • November 12, 2025

Funding the Future of Science: Proposed NIH Funding Cuts Throw US Biomedical Research Into Uncertainty

  • November 4, 2025
Funding the Future of Science: Proposed NIH Funding Cuts Throw US Biomedical Research Into Uncertainty

Student-Hosted Video Game Hackathon Scheduled for Late September

  • September 22, 2025
Student-Hosted Video Game Hackathon Scheduled for Late September

World Languages Coordinator Reflects On Career, Retirement

  • June 9, 2025
World Languages Coordinator Reflects On Career, Retirement

CollegeBoard Scores 1/5 on AP Testing Administration

  • June 9, 2025

AHS Student Directs Coming-of-Age Film, ‘Horizon’

  • June 9, 2025

Discover more from AHS NEWSPAPER

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading